Where your buyers ask questions now
Pages+
Drafts
Home· 1200
The AI marketing tool built for founders.
Acme plans, drafts, and publishes your marketing from one weekly brief, so you can get back to building.
Acme vs Jasper
| Acme | Jasper | |
|---|---|---|
| Grounded in your repo | ✓ | – |
| Founder-voice drafts | ✓ | – |
| Price / mo | $49 | $125 |
Simple pricing
© Acme · Privacy · Terms
Buyers who ask that get a comparison, and only Jasper has one. I drafted Acme vs Jasper from your repo and rewrote the H1 to match the query.
Done. Nothing ships until you approve: review both and they’re yours to publish.
Your site, on the canvas.
Ask for the answer you want to win. Miravi drafts the sections that close the gap, stages them on your real pages, and waits for your approval.
The brief
Your buyers ask ChatGPT what to use, and the answers cite whoever AI trusts.
Today that isn’t you.
Miravi wins those answers, and you wake up to marketing already done.
An AI CMO that shows its work
Does the work alone (research, drafts, audits, posts) but never decides alone
Miravi runs like a coworker with checkpoints: it researches on its own, then stops and brings you the decision. Approve, dismiss, or redirect. It never ships a word you didn’t sign off, and everything it claims is grounded in your real product.
Approve everything
The agent drafts and proposes on its own, then stops. Nothing goes into your library without your sign-off: no post, no page, no fix.
Grounded in your codebase
Connect your GitHub repo read-only and drafts cite real product facts instead of confident fiction. Your repo is the source of truth.
cheapestblocked
guaranteedrule 07
AI-poweredrule 09
A hard “do not say” list
Your voice rules and banned words gate every draft before it reaches you. Brand safety is a pipeline step, not a hope.
Your accounts stay yours
Connect LinkedIn and Miravi can post for you, but only the post you approved. Your password never reaches us. No post is ever scheduled and none goes out on its own.
Shows its reasoning
Every audit note and citation gap links back to why. The reasoning rail narrates what the agent saw, what it proposed, and what it left alone.
Private by default
Your tokens are encrypted at rest and your data stays yours: it grounds your drafts and nothing else. The canvas audits your site; it never touches it.
The search box moved. Your marketing didn’t.
answers cite you
Miravi tracks the questions your buyers ask AI and shows exactly where you’re cited, and where a competitor wins instead.
from gap to draft
Launch-week, vs-page, and comparison content goes from two days to two hours.
to approve
The agent drafts overnight. You review the data-backed post and approve it into your library.
Proof on your own graph: watch AI crawlers read what you shipped.
Read: what to put in robots.txt for AI enginesBrand brain
A marketing hire that remembers your business
Content tools start from zero every session. Miravi keeps a brand brain of your product, ICP, voice, and competitors, and reads your actual GitHub repo, so every draft states real product facts in your voice. Every result sharpens the next move.
Personas
Miravi for
Your buyers ask AI which tools to use, and technical content wins those answers. Miravi reads your codebase and drafts the comparison pages and integration posts that get cited, grounded in real product facts. You approve; you stay in control.
Learn moreYou're the engineer, the CEO, and the entire marketing department. Miravi is the hire you can't make yet: it researches overnight, drafts the work, and queues the decisions. You log in each morning to work already done.
Learn moreDistribution is your job now, and there's no marketing hire in the plan. Miravi keeps a brand brain (product, ICP, voice, competitors) and turns citation gaps into data-backed drafts, so the motion keeps running through the weeks you can't touch it.
Learn moreYou'd rather ship code than write copy. Miravi connects to your GitHub repo and grounds every draft in what the code actually does: real product facts, in your voice, nothing you have to fact-check before it goes out.
Learn moreNo agency retainer, no content team. Miravi does the work of a marketing hire at a flat price: research, drafts, and site fixes, each queued as a one-click decision. You pay for shipped pages, not dashboards.
Learn moreYour next users ask ChatGPT and Perplexity what to build with. Miravi tracks those questions, shows where you're cited and where a competitor wins instead, then drafts the post that closes the gap.
Learn moreTurn gaps into
cited answers
FAQ
Frequently Asked Questions
It runs the research on its own cadence: which questions your buyers ask AI assistants, where you’re cited, where a competitor wins instead, and what changed on your pages.
When it finds something worth acting on, it does the work first: drafts the post that closes a citation gap, writes the LinkedIn post in your voice, pins fixes on your site, and queues it as a decision.
Then it stops. The “Needs you” queue is the whole interface: approve, dismiss, or redirect. It never ships a word you didn’t sign off.
You log in to work already done. Each morning opens with a briefing of what it found overnight and the few decisions that need you.
Your site: no. Approved drafts land in your library and you ship them wherever your site lives. Miravi never touches your CMS, and the site audit is an annotated review, not an edit.
LinkedIn: yes, once you connect it, and only on your say-so. You read the post, you approve it, and Miravi sends it to your profile so you are not copying text between tabs. Nothing is scheduled and nothing goes out unapproved.
Citation tracking runs on Perplexity today. Every tracked prompt is re-asked on a schedule and Miravi records whether you’re cited, at what position, and who wins instead. Google Search Console connects for organic metrics and a window into Google AI Overviews.
The attribution graph is engine-agnostic: it logs every AI crawler reading your pages (PerplexityBot, GPTBot, ClaudeBot and friends), so you see the reads no matter which assistant sends them.
GEO dashboards like Profound show you charts about where you’re cited and leave the work to you. Content tools like Jasper write generic posts and start from zero every session.
Miravi is the worker, not the dashboard: it monitors your tracked prompts, decides what to write next based on what it found, drafts it grounded in your codebase and voice, and brings you the decision.
And it remembers. The brand brain (product, ICP, voice, competitors, what you’ve told it) sharpens every next action, so month three is smarter than day one.
Minutes. Give it your URL and it scans your live site, drafts your brand brain (product, ICP, voice) and asks you to confirm it. Connect GitHub read-only if you want drafts grounded in your actual code.
Then the first research run starts streaming: your tracked prompts get asked, the answers come back, and the first gaps land in the queue while you watch.